June 4, 2005

  •   Drama of the Diagonal
      
       The 4×4 Square:
      French Perspectives

    Earendil_Silmarils:
    The image “http://www.log24.com/log/pix05A/050604-Fuite1.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.
      
       Les Anamorphoses:
     
       The image “http://www.log24.com/log/pix05A/050604-DesertSquare.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.
     
      “Pour construire un dessin en perspective,
       le peintre trace sur sa toile des repères:
       la ligne d’horizon (1),
       le point de fuite principal (2)
       où se rencontre les lignes de fuite (3)
       et le point de fuite des diagonales (4).”
       _______________________________
      
      Serge Mehl,
       Perspective &
      Géométrie Projective:
      
       “… la géométrie projective était souvent
       synonyme de géométrie supérieure.
       Elle s’opposait à la géométrie
       euclidienne: élémentaire
      
      La géométrie projective, certes supérieure
       car assez ardue, permet d’établir
       de façon élégante des résultats de
       la géométrie élémentaire.”
      
      Similarly…
      
      Finite projective geometry
      (in particular, Galois geometry)
       is certainly superior to
       the elementary geometry of
      quilt-pattern symmetry
      and allows us to establish
       de façon élégante
       some results of that
       elementary geometry.
      
      Other Related Material…
      
       from algebra rather than
       geometry, and from a German
       rather than from the French:  

    This is the relativity problem:
    to fix objectively a class of
    equivalent coordinatizations
    and to ascertain
    the group of transformations S
    mediating between them.”
    – Hermann Weyl,
    The Classical Groups,
    Princeton U. Press, 1946

    The image “http://www.log24.com/log/pix05/050124-galois12s.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

    Evariste Galois

     Weyl also says that the profound branch
    of mathematics known as Galois theory

       “… is nothing else but the
       relativity theory for the set Sigma,
       a set which, by its discrete and
        finite character, is conceptually
       so much simpler than the
       infinite set of points in space
       or space-time dealt with
       by ordinary relativity theory.”
      — Weyl, Symmetry,
       Princeton U. Press, 1952
      
       Metaphor and Algebra…  

    “Perhaps every science must
    start with metaphor
    and end with algebra;
    and perhaps without metaphor
    there would never have been
    any algebra.” 

       – attributed, in varying forms, to
       Max Black, Models and Metaphors, 1962

    For metaphor and
    algebra combined, see  

      “Symmetry invariance
     
    in a diamond ring,”

      A.M.S. abstract 79T-A37,
    Notices of the
    American Mathematical Society,
    February 1979, pages A-193, 194 —
    the original version of the 4×4 case
    of the diamond theorem.

      
    More on Max Black…

    “When approaching unfamiliar territory, we often, as
    observed earlier, try to describe or frame the novel situation using
    metaphors based on relations perceived in a familiar domain, and by
    using our powers of association, and our ability to exploit the
    structural similarity, we go on to conjecture new features for
    consideration, often not noticed at the outset. The metaphor works,
    according to Max Black, by transferring the associated ideas and
    implications of the secondary to the primary system, and by selecting,
    emphasising and suppressing features of the primary in such a way that
    new slants on it are illuminated.”

    — Paul Thompson, University College, Oxford,
        The Nature and Role of Intuition
         in Mathematical Epistemology

      A New Slant…  

    That intuition, metaphor (i.e., analogy), and association may lead
    us astray is well known.  The examples of French perspective above
    show what might happen if someone ignorant of finite geometry were to
    associate the phrase “4×4 square” with the phrase “projective
    geometry.”  The results are ridiculously inappropriate, but at
    least the second example does, literally, illuminate “new slants”–
    i.e., diagonals– within the perspective drawing of the 4×4 square.

    Similarly, analogy led the ancient Greeks to believe that the diagonal
    of a square is commensurate with the side… until someone gave them a new slant on the subject.

Post a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *