July 15, 2008

  • Elliptic comment:

    My comment on a discussion of elliptic curves and modular forms at Secret Blogging Seminar, about 10 PM tonight:

    How does this affect popularized discussions of the Taniyama-Shimura
    conjecture– for instance, Ivars Peterson’s, in “Curving Beyond Fermat,”
    November 1999– which claim, for instance, that “Elliptic curves and
    modular forms are mathematically so different that mathematicians
    initially [in the 1950's, the early days of the conjecture] couldn’t
    believe that the two are related.”?

    Update of about 10:45 PM tonight:

    A reply by the author of the discussion, Scott Carnahan:

    I don’t think anyone doubted that there is a connection between
    elliptic curves and modular forms on the level I described above.
    However, the Taniyama-Shimura conjecture refers to a more advanced idea
    about a deeper connection.

    Carnahan then gives a one-paragraph summary, definitely not popularized, of the deeper connection.

Post a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *