October 24, 2006

  • Two-part invention:

    Another illustration
    of the previous entry‘s concept of
    a “critical mass” of weblog entries,
    a concept reflected in
    the saying
    You can’t win the lottery
        if you don’t buy a ticket.” 

    Mathematics and Narrative:
    A Two-Part Invention

    Here are today’s
    numbers from the
    Keystone State:

    The image “http://www.log24.com/log/pix06A/061024-PAlottery.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

    Here is an interpretation
    of those numbers:

    “The
    geometrization conjecture, also known as Thurston’s geometrization
    conjecture, concerns the geometric structure of compact 3-manifolds. The geometrization conjecture can be considered an analogue for 3-manifolds of the uniformization theorem for surfaces. It
    was proposed by William Thurston in the late 1970s. It ‘includes’ other
    conjectures, such as the Poincaré conjecture and the Thurston
    elliptization conjecture.”

    The second sentence, in bold
    type, was added on 8/21 by yours truly. No deep learning or
    original thought was required to make this important improvement in the
    article; the sentence was simply copied from the then-current version
    of the article on Grigori Perelman (who has, it seems, proved the geometrization conjecture).

    This
    may serve as an example of the “mathematics” part of the above phrase
    “Mathematics and Narrative” — a phrase which served, with associated
    links, as the Log24 entry for 8/21.

    7/23 — Narrative:

    “Each
    step in the story is a work of art, and the story as a whole is a
    sequence of episodes of rare beauty, a drama built out of nothing but
    numbers and imagination.” –Freeman Dyson

    This quotation appeared in the Log24 entry for 7/23,
    “Dance of the Numbers.”  What Dyson calls a “story” or “drama” is
    in fact mathematics. (Dyson calls the “steps” in the story “works of
    art,” so  it is clear that Dyson (a former student of G. H. Hardy)
    is discussing mathematical steps, not paragraphs in someone’s
    account– perhaps a work of art, perhaps not– of mathematical
    history.)  I personally regard the rhetorical trick of calling the
    steps leading to a mathematical result a “story” as contemptible
    vulgarization, but Dyson, as someone whose work (pdf) led to the particular result he is discussing, is entitled to dramatize it as he pleases.

    For related material on mathematics, narrative, and vulgarization, click here.

    The
    art of interpretation (applied above to a lottery) is relevant to
    narrative and perhaps also, in some sense, to the arts of mathematical
    research and exposition (if not to mathematics itself).  This art
    is called hermeneutics.

    For more on the subject, see the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy article on Hans-Georg Gadamer, “the decisive figure in the development of twentieth-century hermeneutics.”


    See also the work of Msgr. Robert Sokolowski of the Catholic University of America, which includes

    “Foreword” in Gian-Carlo Rota,

     Indiscrete Thoughts,
     Boston: Birkhäuser Verlag,

     1996, xiii-xvii, and

    “Gadamer’s Theory of Hermeneutics” in
     The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer,
     edited by Lewis E. Hahn,
     The Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. 24,
     Chicago: Open Court Publishers,
     1997, 223-34.

Post a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *