"Contemporary
literary theory did not emerge in an
intellectual and cultural vacuum. The subordination of art to
argument and ideas has been a long time in the works. In The Painted Word, a
rumination on the state of American painting in the 1970s, Tom Wolfe
described an epiphany he had one Sunday morning while reading an
article in the New York Times on an exhibit at Yale University. To appreciate
contemporary art-- the paintings of Jackson Pollock and still
more so his followers-- which to the naked eye appeared
indistinguishable from kindergarten splatterings and which provided
little immediate pleasure or illumination, it was
'crucial,' Wolfe realized, to have a 'persuasive
theory,' a prefabricated conceptual lens to make sense of the
work and bring into focus the artist's point. From there it
was just a short step to the belief that the critic who supplies
the theories is the equal, if not the superior, of the artist who
creates the painting."
-- Peter Berkowitz, "Literature in Theory"

Cover art by Rea Irvin
The New Yorker
first appeared.
Related material:
Aldous Huxley on
The Perennial Philosophy
(ART WARS, March 13, 2003)
and William James on religion:
experience displays the world through a different lens than is present
in ordinary experience. The experience, in his words, is 'ineffable'...."
For an experience that is
perhaps more effable,
see the oeuvre of
Jill St. John.
Related material:
A drama for Mardi Gras,
The Crimson Passion,
and (postscript of 2:56 PM)
today's Harvard Crimson
(pdf, 843k)
Recent Comments