Kaleidoscope, continued
From Clifford Geertz, The Cerebral Savage:
"Savage
logic works like a kaleidoscope whose chips can fall into a variety of
patterns while remaining unchanged in quantity, form, or color. The
number of patterns producible in this way may be large if the chips are
numerous and varied enough, but it is not infinite. The patterns
consist in the disposition of the chips vis-a-vis one another (that is,
they are a function of the relationships among the chips rather than
their individual properties considered separately). And their
range of possible transformations is strictly determined by the
construction of the kaleidoscope, the inner law which governs its
operation. And so it is too with savage thought. Both anecdotal
and geometric, it builds coherent structures out of 'the odds and ends
left over from psychological or historical process.'
These
odds and ends, the chips of the kaleidoscope, are images drawn from
myth, ritual, magic, and empirical lore.... as in a kaleidoscope,
one always sees the chips distributed in some pattern, however
ill-formed or irregular. But, as in a kaleidoscope, they are
detachable from these structures and arrangeable into different ones of
a similar sort.... Levi-Strauss generalizes this permutational
view of thinking to savage thought in general. It is all a matter
of shuffling discrete (and concrete) images--totem animals, sacred
colors, wind directions, sun deities, or whatever--so as to produce
symbolic structures capable of formulating and communicating objective
(which is not to say accurate) analyses of the social and physical
worlds.
.... And the point is general. The relationship between a symbolic structure and its referent, the basis of its meaning,
is fundamentally 'logical,' a coincidence of form-- not affective, not
historical, not functional. Savage thought is frozen reason and
anthropology is, like music and mathematics, 'one of the few true
vocations.'
Or like linguistics."
Edward Sapir on Linguistics, Mathematics, and Music:
"...
linguistics has also that profoundly serene and satisfying quality
which inheres in mathematics and in music and which may be described as
the creation out of simple elements of a self-contained universe of
forms. Linguistics has neither the sweep nor the instrumental
power of mathematics, nor has it the universal aesthetic appeal of
music. But under its crabbed, technical, appearance there lies
hidden the same classical spirit, the same freedom in restraint, which
animates mathematics and music at their purest."
-Edward Sapir, "The Grammarian and his Language,"
American Mercury 1:149-155,1924
From Robert de Marrais, Canonical Collage-oscopes:
"...underwriting
the form languages of ever more domains of mathematics is a set of deep
patterns which not only offer access to a kind of ideality that Plato
claimed to see the universe as created with in the Timaeus;
more than this, the realm of Platonic forms is itself subsumed in this
new set of design elements-- and their most general instances are not
the regular solids, but crystallographic reflection groups. You
know, those things the non-professionals call . . . kaleidoscopes! * (In the next exciting episode, we'll see how Derrida claims mathematics is the key to freeing us from 'logocentrism' **-- then ask him why, then, he jettisoned the deepest structures of mathematical patterning just to make his name...)
* H. S. M. Coxeter, Regular Polytopes (New York: Dover, 1973) is the great classic text by a great creative force in this beautiful area of geometry (A polytope is an n-dimensional analog of a polygon or polyhedron. Chapter V of this book is entitled 'The Kaleidoscope'....)
**
... contemporary with the Johns Hopkins hatchet job that won him
American marketshare, Derrida was also being subjected to a series of
probing interviews in Paris by the hometown crowd. He first
gained academic notoriety in France for his book-length reading of
Husserl's two-dozen-page essay on 'The Origin of Geometry.' The
interviews were collected under the rubric of Positions
(Chicago: U. of Chicago Press, 1981...). On pp.
34-5 he says the following: 'the resistance to logico-mathematical
notation has always been the signature of logocentrism and phonologism
in the event to which they have dominated metaphysics and the classical
semiological and linguistic projects.... A grammatology that would
break with this system of presuppositions, then, must in effect
liberate the mathematization of language.... The effective progress of
mathematical notation thus goes along with the deconstruction of
metaphysics, with the profound renewal of mathematics itself, and the
concept of science for which mathematics has always been the
model.' Nice campaign speech, Jacques; but as we'll see, you
reneged on your promise not just with the kaleidoscope (and we'll investigate, in
depth, the many layers of contradiction and cluelessness you put on
display in that disingenuous 'playing to the house'); no, we'll see
how, at numerous other critical junctures, you instinctively took the
wrong fork in the road whenever mathematical issues arose...
henceforth, monsieur, as Joe Louis once said, 'You can run, but you
just can't hide.'...."
Recent Comments